The definitive tool for measuring how your tech team performs.
Built from the analysis of thousands of technology teams, Devint turns code, deliveries and evaluations into a clear score from 0 to 100.
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Jira
Claude
OpenAI
Managing a tech team
should not come down
to guesswork.
Lines of code, hours, deliveries and evaluations each show a different part of the work. Looked at in isolation, though, they never tell the whole story.
Devint brings those signals together and turns different sources of information into a single view of performance, helping managers spot progress, warning signs and development opportunities with far more clarity.
Are the deliveries healthy?
Is time well managed?
Is the evaluation enough?
Is AI actually being used?
But how do you turn so many signals
into a fair evaluation?
Devint combines different aspects of the work to build a complete view of performance, which results in the DevScore, our scoring system, built on 3 pillars:
Dimensions
Weights
Reference bands
Six dimensions, one complete view
The DevScore combines the different aspects of each developer's work to arrive at a score from 0 to 100, based on configurable healthy reference bands.
Below the healthy band, the signal is insufficient. Inside it, the score grows. Above it, the score saturates: extra volume adds no points, which removes artificial incentives. See the example:
Delivery pace
Commits per working day and pull requests per week: is there a steady flow of reviewable delivery?
Code contribution
Alive lines and change entropy: contribution that stays in the product, not just motion.
Technical skill
Evaluation by the manager, the people lead and the technical lead against explicit seniority criteria.
Time tracking
Consistency of time logging: capacity, cost and predictability stop being a matter of opinion.
Behavior
Communication, predictability and accountability, assessed by direct leadership. Software is collective work.
AI and agent adoption
Real use of agents and copilots in the workflow: the company invests, Devint shows whether adoption is actually happening.
The DevScore shows
progress, not position
In a relative ranking, even when the whole team improves, someone is still in last place.
Our goal is not to create competition between teams.
Devint compares each person against stable reference bands, not against the strongest colleague on the team. Collective improvement shows up as collective improvement. Biweekly closings look at the last four full weeks: a trend reading, without the noise of unusual days and without micromanagement.
Understand what sits behind every score
The individual profile opens up how the score is composed: the number is never left unexplained.
- Cycle score with the change vs the previous closing and position within the team.
- All six dimensions broken out, with the signals from the period that support them.
- An 8-week progression, cycle history, technologies and trend.
From the individual to the team: see where progress happens
Compare the health of every squad and follow the overall DevScore ranking, with each person's trend at every closing.
Built for the people who manage people and the people who manage systems.
Two readings of the same score. Select a profile to see the offering in detail.
- Trend by fortnight, per person and per squad, in management language.
- An objective basis for 1:1s, development tracks and promotion conversations.
- Separates a performance problem from a data problem before any conclusion is drawn.
- A capacity and hours view that connects cost, planning and execution.
- Git, hours and AI usage signals combined with leadership evaluation.
- Caps per dimension: inflating commits, lines or hours does not raise the score.
- Operational health by squad: bottlenecks, drops and deviations visible early.
- Weights configurable by context, with governance over every change.
But how does Devint fit into my routine?
No new ceremony, no parallel spreadsheet. The score organizes evidence your workflow already produces.
1. Connect the sources
Git repositories, your time management tool and your AI tools come in as integrations. Leadership evaluations are recorded in the platform itself.
2. Follow the cycles
Every fortnight, Devint consolidates the last four weeks into a score per person and per squad, with the composition broken out by dimension.
3. Decide with evidence
Drops and deviations become a starting point for investigation, not a verdict. The number opens the right conversation: a blocker, context, mentoring or reallocation.
Ready to see your team clearly?
Fill in the form and we will set up a demo of the DevScore applied to your context. We reply within 1 business day.
Prefer email? Write to [email protected]
Frequently asked questions
What is the Devint DevScore?
It is a 0 to 100 indicator that combines six dimensions of development work: delivery pace, code contribution, AI adoption, time tracking, technical skill and collaboration. Each dimension has its own weight and is compared against healthy reference bands.
Is the score a ranking among developers?
No. Devint compares each person against stable reference bands, not against their peers. When the whole team improves, the collective improvement shows up as collective improvement, without creating an artificial last place.
Can the score be gamed with artificial commits or hours?
Every metric has a healthy ceiling: above it, extra volume no longer adds points. The dimensions also cross-check one another, so inflating one signal does not improve technical evaluation, collaboration or real contribution, and gaming tends to leave a trail in review and feedback.
Which tools does Devint integrate with?
Git repositories (such as GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket), time management tools and the AI tools your team uses. Manager and tech lead evaluations are recorded in the platform itself.
How does Devint handle work that never becomes code, such as architecture and mentoring?
The human evaluations of technical skill and collaboration capture work that does not show up in automated metrics. Beyond that, the recommended reading is by trend and by composition, with context from leadership, not by an isolated number.
Latest content
Understanding the Devint evaluation dimensions
Automated signals, leadership evaluations, weights configurable by role and reference bands with a ceiling: how Devint reads each of the six dimensions of the work.
Approaches to developer evaluation — understanding the difference between models
Forced ranking, volume metrics, systems frameworks, perception-based evaluation and absolute scoring: what each model rewards — and where each one fails.
The benefits of implementing a technology performance evaluation model
Conversations with an objective basis, problems visible earlier, predictable capacity and fairer recognition: what changes when technology is evaluated with rigor.