The definitive tool for measuring the performance of your tech team.
Built from the analysis of thousands of technology teams, Devint turns code, delivery and reviews into a clear 0-to-100 score.
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Jira
Claude
OpenAI
Six dimensions. One clear read.
Each dimension compares the person against healthy reference bands, with a cap and a floor. The final score shows the big picture; the dimensions explain where it comes from.
Below the healthy band, the signal is insufficient. Inside it, the score climbs. Above it, the score saturates: extra volume adds no points, which removes the incentive to game it.
Delivery pace
20% weight
Commits per working day and pull requests per week: is there a steady flow of reviewable work?
Code contribution
20% weight
Alive lines and change entropy: contribution that stays in the product, not just motion.
Technical skill
20% weight
Manager and tech lead reviews, against explicit seniority criteria.
Time tracking
15% weight
Consistency in logging hours: capacity, cost and predictability stop being a matter of opinion.
Collaboration and behavior
15% weight
Communication, predictability and accountability, reviewed by direct leadership. Software is collective work.
AI and tooling adoption
10% weight
Real use of agents and copilots in the daily workflow: the company invests, Devint shows whether adoption actually happens.
The DevScore is absolute, not an internal ranking.
In a relative ranking, someone is always last, even when the whole team gets better. Devint compares each person against stable reference bands, not against the strongest teammate. Collective improvement shows up as collective improvement.
Biweekly closings look at the last four complete weeks: a trend read, free of noise from unusual days and free of micromanagement.
Every developer, in depth.
The individual profile opens up the score's composition: the number is never left unexplained.
- Cycle score with the change against the previous close and the position within the team.
- All six dimensions opened up, with the signals from the period that back them.
- An 8-week progression, cycle history, technologies and trend.
Squads side by side. Ranking with context.
Compare the health of each squad and follow the overall DevScore ranking, with every person's trend at each close.
Built for the people who manage people, and for the people who manage systems.
Two readings of the same score. Pick a profile to see what it includes.
- Trends every two weeks, per person and per squad, in management language.
- An objective basis for 1:1s, development tracks and promotion conversations.
- Separates a performance problem from a data problem before anyone draws conclusions.
- A capacity and hours view that connects cost, planning and execution.
- Git signals, hours and AI usage combined with leadership reviews.
- Caps per dimension: inflating commits, lines or hours will not raise the score.
- Operational health per squad: bottlenecks, drops and drift visible early.
- Weights configurable by context, with governance over every change.
How Devint fits into your routine
No new ceremony, no spreadsheet on the side. The score organizes evidence your workflow already produces.
Connect the sources
Git repositories, your time tracking tool and your AI tools come in as integrations. Leadership reviews are recorded inside the platform itself.
Follow the closes
Every two weeks, Devint consolidates the last four weeks into a score per person and per squad, with the composition broken out dimension by dimension.
Have conversations backed by evidence
Drops and drift become something to look into, not a verdict. The number opens the right conversation: a blocker, missing context, mentoring or a change of role.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Devint DevScore?
It is a 0-to-100 indicator that combines six dimensions of development work: delivery pace, code contribution, AI adoption, time tracking, technical skill and collaboration. Each dimension carries its own weight and is compared against healthy reference bands.
Is the Devint score a ranking between developers?
No. Devint compares each person against stable reference bands, not against their peers. When the whole team improves, collective improvement shows up as collective improvement, without creating an artificial last place.
Can the score be gamed with artificial commits or hours?
Every metric has a healthy cap: beyond it, extra volume no longer adds points. The dimensions also cross-check each other, so inflating one signal does not improve technical review, collaboration or real contribution, and gaming tends to leave a trail in code review and feedback.
Which tools does Devint integrate with?
Git repositories (such as GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket), time tracking tools and the AI tools your team uses. Manager and tech lead reviews are recorded inside the platform itself.
How does Devint handle work that never becomes code, such as architecture and mentoring?
Human reviews of technical skill and collaboration capture work that automated metrics never see. On top of that, the recommended way to read the score is by trend and by composition, with context from leadership, never as an isolated number.
Ready to see your team clearly?
Fill in the form and we'll set up a demo of the DevScore applied to your own context. We reply within 1 business day.
Prefer email? Write to [email protected]
Latest articles
Understanding the Devint evaluation dimensions
Automated signals, leadership reviews, weights configurable by role and reference bands with a cap: how Devint reads each of the six dimensions of the work.
Approaches to developer evaluation — understanding the difference between models
Forced ranking, volume metrics, systems frameworks, perception-based reviews and absolute scoring: what each model rewards — and where each one breaks.
The benefits of implementing a performance evaluation model in technology
Conversations with an objective basis, problems visible earlier, predictable capacity and fairer recognition: what changes when technology work is evaluated with real criteria.